Ewen Lumsden vs Joshua Goodger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lumsden vs Goodger analysis and find out who is favored!
Ewen Lumsden vs Joshua Goodger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lumsden 1 - 0 Goodger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lumsden has won 47.31% of points on their second serve, while Goodger has won 46.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lumsden, in recent form, has won 50.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Goodger has won 43.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.39% and 31.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lumsden has saved 47.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goodger has saved 58.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lumsden has won 62.75% of matches played (W/L 32/ 19), with Goodger winning 29.17% (W/L 7/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lumsden has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 11/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8). Goodger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Lumsden has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19), where as Goodger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 29.17% of matches (W/L 7/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lumsden winning 1 times and Goodger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lumsden winning 2 and Goodger winning 0. The last match between Lumsden and Goodger was at the M25 Edgbaston, 17-10-2023, First, I.hard with Ewen Lumsden getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lumsden and Goodger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lumsden winning 0 times and Goodger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lumsden winning 0, and Goodger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lumsden has played against opponents with an average rank of 109.57 while Goodger has played against players with an average rank of 186.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lumsden has won 18% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goodger has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lumsden has converted 45.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goodger has converted 45.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ewen Lumsden
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
821
Rank
821
High
25
Age
Plays
Joshua Goodger
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
61% (54-34)
Career Total W/L
47% (38-43)
57% (12-9)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ewen Lumsden | Joshua Goodger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:17:0 | 1:17:0 |
1st Serve % | 73% (47/64) | 56% (29/52) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (35/47) | 66% (19/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 41% (7/17) | 43% (10/23) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 44% (23/52) | 34% (22/64) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Joshua Goodger
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ewen Lumsden | Joshua Goodger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | 33% (2/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (29/19) | 36% (5/9) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (243/217) | 48% (77/83) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.22 |
Aces Total | 30 | 17 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 44 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:15:20 | 1:43:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 204.95 | 187.33 |
1st Serve % | 64% (616/969) | 65% (283/436) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (397/616) | 68% (192/283) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/353) | 46% (71/153) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (48/105) | 46% (11/24) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (440/1055) | 35% (135/381) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 57% (12/9) | 33% (2/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 33% (2/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 25% (1/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 25% (4/1) |
Ewen Lumsden Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alexandre Reco
Player
Ewen Lumsden
73%
(
73 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Blake Mott
Player
Ewen Lumsden
71%
(
75 of
106)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
109)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Alexander Donski
Player
Ewen Lumsden
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Michael Zhu
Player
Ewen Lumsden
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Joshua Goodger Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joshua Goodger
Player
Demetris Azoides
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Miljan Zekic
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thomas Loxley
Player
Joshua Goodger
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(3) 11-9 | H2H | ||
QF |
Patrick Brady
Player
Joshua Goodger
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Joshua Goodger
Player
David Quayle
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 7-6(2) 10-6 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Demetris Azoides
Player
Joshua Goodger
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joshua Goodger
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Petros Chrysochos
Player
Joshua Goodger
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alec Deckers
Player
Joshua Goodger
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(12) 6-2 | H2H |
view more